How James Olds and Peter Milner's Work Explains Our Drive for 'More'

We all dream of that life-changing moment – the big win, the sudden success that promises to wash away all our troubles and deliver lasting happiness. Consider the story of Billy Hargrove, a warehouse worker who, in June 1997, won a $31 million lottery. A deeply religious man who had worked hard his entire life for his family, this seemed like the ultimate reward. He collected his first installment, bought a ranch, homes for his family, donated generously, and saved for his children's future. Yet, less than two years later, in May 1999, Billy Hargrove ended his own life. His financial advisor reported his last words included the devastating sentiment: "Winning the lottery is the worst thing that has ever happened to me."

This isn't just a one-off tragedy. Studies suggest a staggering percentage of lottery winners eventually face financial ruin, and research by Nobel laureates Daniel Kahneman and Angus Deaton found that beyond a certain income threshold (around $75,000 annually in their study), more money doesn't significantly boost day-to-day happiness or mental well-being.

So, if massive windfalls don't guarantee bliss, what's going on? It seems we often confuse happiness with something else entirely. Let's explore what we're really chasing when we pursue happiness.

The Seductive Promise of "More"

Back in 1953, scientists James Olds and Peter Milner at McGill University stumbled upon something fascinating, quite by accident. While trying to study fear responses in rats, they misplaced an electrode in one rat's brain. Instead of avoiding the corner of the cage where it received mild electrical stimulation, this rat kept returning, seemingly enjoying it.

Intrigued, they set up an experiment where rats could press a lever to stimulate this brain region themselves. The results were startling: the rats pressed the lever relentlessly, choosing the stimulation over food and rest, often until they collapsed from exhaustion. Initially hailed as the discovery of the brain's "pleasure center," further research revealed a more complex picture.

Psychiatrist Robert Heath later conducted similar experiments with human patients at Tulane University. Participants could press buttons to self-stimulate corresponding brain areas. They did so eagerly, sometimes up to 40 times a minute, foregoing food and drink. While they described the sensation as pleasant, their behavior, combined with reports of underlying anxiety and a feeling of desperation – a sense that true satisfaction was always just out of reach – suggested something other than pure pleasure was at play.

Neurobiologists now understand that Olds and Milner hadn't found a pure "pleasure center," but rather tapped into the brain's powerful reinforcement system. This primitive system evolved to motivate us to seek out things necessary for survival – food, water, social connection. It operates on anticipation and desire, releasing chemicals that essentially say, "Do that again! It will be great!" Each stimulation encourages the next stimulation, creating a cycle of wanting, but not necessarily leading to lasting satisfaction or contentment.

In our modern world, this system isn't just triggered by basic needs or electrodes. It's constantly activated by advertisements promising joy, menus showcasing tempting foods, the lure of social media popularity, the dream of a lottery win. These stimuli whisper the same promise of happiness, potentially turning us into seekers constantly chasing the next hit, like the rats pressing the lever. Our brain becomes fixated on "I want," making true contentment harder to find.

When most people say they're looking for happiness, they're often chasing these triggers: more delicious food, more parties, more validation, newer possessions. But pleasure, while related to happiness, doesn't automatically cause it, especially when it becomes an obsession. Ask anyone who has battled addiction, or someone whose pursuit of fleeting pleasure led to devastating personal consequences, if that chase ultimately brought them happiness. Pleasure is often the most superficial form of satisfaction, easily obtained and easily used to numb or distract ourselves. As the philosopher Blaise Pascal observed, those who enter the house of happiness through the door of pleasure often leave through the door of suffering.

When "Just Be Happy" Backfires

It's not just the relentless pursuit of pleasure that can mislead us. Consider the pressure, both internal and external, to always be positive. We hear phrases like "Don't worry, be happy!" or "Good vibes only!" While optimism has its place, the constant denial of negative emotions – sometimes called "toxic positivity" – can be incredibly harmful.

Think of it as a defense mechanism. We instinctively want to shield ourselves from unpleasantness. But simply pretending negative feelings don't exist doesn't make them disappear. Instead, they can accumulate beneath the surface, leading to deeper, longer-lasting emotional distress and dysfunction down the line.

Research by James Gross and Robert Levenson highlights this. In one study, participants watched distressing medical films. One group was allowed to express their emotions naturally, while the other was instructed to suppress their feelings and act as if nothing bothered them. While the suppressors appeared calm externally, physiological measures like heart rate and sweating revealed they were experiencing significantly more internal stress. Their bodies were reacting intensely, even as they maintained a composed facade.

Dealing skillfully with negative emotions doesn't mean wallowing in them, but it does mean acknowledging their reality. Sadness, anger, frustration, disappointment – these are normal parts of the human experience. Recognizing them, perhaps verbalizing them ("I feel really disappointed right now"), and finding healthy ways to process them is crucial for mental well-being. Accepting our feelings, both good and bad, allows us to process them constructively, relieving the stress that comes from suppression. Embracing our whole selves, imperfections and all, is fundamental to a healthy and genuinely happy emotional life.

Beyond Pleasure and Forced Smiles

So, where does this leave us? It seems true, sustainable happiness isn't found solely in chasing the next pleasurable high, nor in plastering on a smile when we're hurting inside. Pleasure is great, even necessary in moderation, but it's often a consequence of happiness, not its cause. When you align your life with meaningful values and engage in activities that fulfill you, pleasure often follows naturally.

Similarly, relentlessly forcing positivity means burying your head in the sand. Problems are an inevitable part of life. Denying their existence prevents us from tackling them, and overcoming challenges is, paradoxically, a significant source of deep satisfaction and happiness.

Perhaps the key is diversification. Don't tie your happiness to just one thing – not just pleasure, not just achievement, not just positive thinking. Cultivate multiple sources of meaning and well-being. Nurture relationships, pursue interests, engage with your values, allow yourself to feel the full spectrum of human emotion, and find satisfaction in navigating life's inevitable ups and downs. True happiness might be less like a destination to be reached through a single gate, and more like a garden nourished by many different streams.

References & Further Reading:

  • Kahneman, D., & Deaton, A. (2010). High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(38), 16489–16493.
    Brief Note: This highly influential study provides empirical evidence for the idea discussed in the article that while having more money improves people's overall life satisfaction (how they think about their life), it doesn't necessarily improve their day-to-day emotional happiness (how they actually feel moment-to-moment) beyond a certain income level (cited as approximately $75,000/year in the US at the time of the study). This supports the point that external achievements like wealth don't automatically equate to happiness.
  • Olds, J., & Milner, P. (1954). Positive reinforcement produced by electrical stimulation of septal area and other regions of rat brain. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 47(6), 419–427.
    Brief Note: This is the classic paper detailing the original discovery of brain reward circuits, as described in the article. It documents the experiments where rats compulsively self-stimulated specific brain regions, choosing this stimulation over basic needs. This work laid the foundation for understanding the brain's reinforcement system and the difference between 'wanting' and 'liking', central to the discussion of chasing pleasure. (See pp. 420-424 for experimental details and results).
  • Gross, J. J., & Levenson, R. W. (1993). Emotional suppression: Physiology, self-report, and expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(6), 970–986.
    Brief Note: This study directly supports the article's section on the downsides of suppressing emotions. It demonstrates experimentally that instructing individuals to hide their emotional expressions while viewing emotionally charged films leads to reduced outward signs of emotion but increased physiological activation (e.g., cardiovascular response). This highlights the hidden cost of emotional suppression mentioned in the context of toxic positivity. (See pp. 976-980 for methods and results regarding physiological costs).
You need to be logged in to send messages
Login Sign up
To create your specialist profile, please log in to your account.
Login Sign up
You need to be logged in to contact us
Login Sign up
To create a new Question, please log in or create an account
Login Sign up
Share on other sites

If you are considering psychotherapy but do not know where to start, a free initial consultation is the perfect first step. It will allow you to explore your options, ask questions, and feel more confident about taking the first step towards your well-being.

It is a 30-minute, completely free meeting with a Mental Health specialist that does not obligate you to anything.

What are the benefits of a free consultation?

Who is a free consultation suitable for?

Important:

Potential benefits of a free initial consultation

During this first session: potential clients have the chance to learn more about you and your approach before agreeing to work together.

Offering a free consultation will help you build trust with the client. It shows them that you want to give them a chance to make sure you are the right person to help them before they move forward. Additionally, you should also be confident that you can support your clients and that the client has problems that you can help them cope with. Also, you can avoid any ethical difficult situations about charging a client for a session in which you choose not to proceed based on fit.

We've found that people are more likely to proceed with therapy after a free consultation, as it lowers the barrier to starting the process. Many people starting therapy are apprehensive about the unknown, even if they've had sessions before. Our culture associates a "risk-free" mindset with free offers, helping people feel more comfortable during the initial conversation with a specialist.

Another key advantage for Specialist

Specialists offering free initial consultations will be featured prominently in our upcoming advertising campaign, giving you greater visibility.

It's important to note that the initial consultation differs from a typical therapy session:

No Internet Connection It seems you’ve lost your internet connection. Please refresh your page to try again. Your message has been sent